State of the Service Desk Part 4: The Increasing Demand
Category
Category
This blog series explores the topics discussed in servicely.ai’s State of the Service Desk report. More details at the bottom of this blog article
A number of factors have led to an uptick in demand for support over the previous 12 months, including:
The challenge for service desk operators is that resources are not scaling linearly with demand, and operators are being asked to "do more with less".
“We have gone from 800 calls per month to 5000 calls per month with no increase in headcount to cover that. Hold times up, and abandonment rate from 8% to 24%. We just don’t have enough people to answer the phones. Look, service desk is an equation. Plug in the variables and you can predict wait times and abandonment rate, per time of day.”
– Senior Director of IT Operations, Internet
One service desk analyst reported that their incentives were so structured that if it looked like they were going to exceed their SLA on CHT then their interests were best served by just escalating the ticket to Tier 2.Several reported that pressure to perform against SLAs under increased volume led to more stress, and that this was causing staff attrition (see "People" section) which ultimately led to a loss of productivity for the service desk.
Strategic responses to the increase in demand were characterized by the following:
Some found senior management supportive, but others put a lot of pressure on IT to perform.
"Senior management wants five things yet will only fund two. But you can’t make ice cream out of water”
- CIO, HealthCare.
Lack of investment limits service desk transformation, since budget constraints affect both service levels but also the pace of automation.
Several leaders reported willingness to sacrifice short- and medium-term performance in order to drive efficiencies by effectively addressing the second two points above. However they noted the need for point 1 above, in that such strategic choices needed to be aligned with senior leadership to provide "top cover".
Several highlighted the need for support to collaborate with developers, engineers and testers to ensure that products were only shipped if they were mature enough to not drive a significant increase in support demand.
This sort of collaboration is facilitated by the move towards devops models, and in some cases by the practice of giving devs rotations in ops to better understand the holistic picture.
The following methods were reported as ways of effecting continuous service improvement (CSI):
When overwhelmed with the volume of service requests CSI is hard to do for two reasons:
The perpetual challenge for service desks is to carve out resources for automations, orchestration and process improvements while meeting the increasing demand and maintaining service levels.
Next - Part 5: Transformation, Consolidation and Integration n late 2020 servicely.ai conducted 23 research interviews with service desk executives, managers and practitioners, to explore the State of the Service Desk in the post-COVID19 world.
The interview results were synthesised into a report that covers the following topics:
This blog series will serialise the topics listed above. The full report is available for download at www.servicely.ai/sotsd.If you would like to discuss any of these topics please get in touch via the website or book a meeting at www.servicely.ai/calendar.
A number of factors have led to an uptick in demand for support over the previous 12 months, including:
The challenge for service desk operators is that resources are not scaling linearly with demand, and operators are being asked to "do more with less".
“We have gone from 800 calls per month to 5000 calls per month with no increase in headcount to cover that. Hold times up, and abandonment rate from 8% to 24%. We just don’t have enough people to answer the phones. Look, service desk is an equation. Plug in the variables and you can predict wait times and abandonment rate, per time of day.”
– Senior Director of IT Operations, Internet
One service desk analyst reported that their incentives were so structured that if it looked like they were going to exceed their SLA on CHT then their interests were best served by just escalating the ticket to Tier 2.Several reported that pressure to perform against SLAs under increased volume led to more stress, and that this was causing staff attrition (see "People" section) which ultimately led to a loss of productivity for the service desk.
Strategic responses to the increase in demand were characterized by the following:
Some found senior management supportive, but others put a lot of pressure on IT to perform.
"Senior management wants five things yet will only fund two. But you can’t make ice cream out of water”
- CIO, HealthCare.
Lack of investment limits service desk transformation, since budget constraints affect both service levels but also the pace of automation.
Several leaders reported willingness to sacrifice short- and medium-term performance in order to drive efficiencies by effectively addressing the second two points above. However they noted the need for point 1 above, in that such strategic choices needed to be aligned with senior leadership to provide "top cover".
Several highlighted the need for support to collaborate with developers, engineers and testers to ensure that products were only shipped if they were mature enough to not drive a significant increase in support demand.
This sort of collaboration is facilitated by the move towards devops models, and in some cases by the practice of giving devs rotations in ops to better understand the holistic picture.
The following methods were reported as ways of effecting continuous service improvement (CSI):
When overwhelmed with the volume of service requests CSI is hard to do for two reasons:
The perpetual challenge for service desks is to carve out resources for automations, orchestration and process improvements while meeting the increasing demand and maintaining service levels.
Next - Part 5: Transformation, Consolidation and Integration n late 2020 servicely.ai conducted 23 research interviews with service desk executives, managers and practitioners, to explore the State of the Service Desk in the post-COVID19 world.
The interview results were synthesised into a report that covers the following topics:
This blog series will serialise the topics listed above. The full report is available for download at www.servicely.ai/sotsd.If you would like to discuss any of these topics please get in touch via the website or book a meeting at www.servicely.ai/calendar.
Mi tincidunt elit, id quisque ligula ac diam, amet. Vel etiam suspendisse morbi eleifend faucibus eget vestibulum felis. Dictum quis montes, sit sit. Tellus aliquam enim urna, etiam. Mauris posuere vulputate arcu amet, vitae nisi, tellus tincidunt. At feugiat sapien varius id.
Eget quis mi enim, leo lacinia pharetra, semper. Eget in volutpat mollis at volutpat lectus velit, sed auctor. Porttitor fames arcu quis fusce augue enim. Quis at habitant diam at. Suscipit tristique risus, at donec. In turpis vel et quam imperdiet. Ipsum molestie aliquet sodales id est ac volutpat.
Elit nisi in eleifend sed nisi. Pulvinar at orci, proin imperdiet commodo consectetur convallis risus. Sed condimentum enim dignissim adipiscing faucibus consequat, urna. Viverra purus et erat auctor aliquam. Risus, volutpat vulputate posuere purus sit congue convallis aliquet. Arcu id augue ut feugiat donec porttitor neque. Mauris, neque ultricies eu vestibulum, bibendum quam lorem id. Dolor lacus, eget nunc lectus in tellus, pharetra, porttitor.
"Ipsum sit mattis nulla quam nulla. Gravida id gravida ac enim mauris id. Non pellentesque congue eget consectetur turpis. Sapien, dictum molestie sem tempor. Diam elit, orci, tincidunt aenean tempus."
Tristique odio senectus nam posuere ornare leo metus, ultricies. Blandit duis ultricies vulputate morbi feugiat cras placerat elit. Aliquam tellus lorem sed ac. Montes, sed mattis pellentesque suscipit accumsan. Cursus viverra aenean magna risus elementum faucibus molestie pellentesque. Arcu ultricies sed mauris vestibulum.
Morbi sed imperdiet in ipsum, adipiscing elit dui lectus. Tellus id scelerisque est ultricies ultricies. Duis est sit sed leo nisl, blandit elit sagittis. Quisque tristique consequat quam sed. Nisl at scelerisque amet nulla purus habitasse.
Nunc sed faucibus bibendum feugiat sed interdum. Ipsum egestas condimentum mi massa. In tincidunt pharetra consectetur sed duis facilisis metus. Etiam egestas in nec sed et. Quis lobortis at sit dictum eget nibh tortor commodo cursus.
Odio felis sagittis, morbi feugiat tortor vitae feugiat fusce aliquet. Nam elementum urna nisi aliquet erat dolor enim. Ornare id morbi eget ipsum. Aliquam senectus neque ut id eget consectetur dictum. Donec posuere pharetra odio consequat scelerisque et, nunc tortor.
Nulla adipiscing erat a erat. Condimentum lorem posuere gravida enim posuere cursus diam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Lorem gravida dui in nec lorem vel. Tristique diam.